Rivermark’s fictional one-year community fund
—- Floors met
- —
- Shared score
- —
- Revision
- 1
- Status
- Loading
Common Ground — a shared fixed-budget decision between a person and an agent
The agent can prove a compromise. You decide whether it becomes real.
Ask for a deterministic compromise above. Its exact deltas appear here immediately, the revision stays put, and only this human commitment action can apply it.
Last decision
What would it cost to protect this?
Name a commitment and the minimum it must keep. The application returns the exact swap — or says plainly that no allocation can do it. Asking never changes the shared scenario.
The agent can price this. Only a person can apply it.
Who the spreadsheet has to answer to
Each floor is a transparent weighted commitment, not a model opinion.
Adjust the five visible commitments
Use $5,000 increments. Changes are shared immediately with the agent-facing state.
| Commitment | What it changes | Your allocation | Human starting point |
|---|
How a decision actually moves
- 1 You set the priorities. Five commitments, edited in $5,000 steps.
-
2
The agent gets five advisory tools.
Typed, discoverable, and read-only via
document.modelContext. - 3 Common Ground's rules accept or reject. Deterministic. The same input always returns the same answer.
- 4 You review, then apply. Nothing reaches the shared scenario without this step.
Every action leaves a readable trail.
The WebMCP contract: capabilities, not a magic wand.
These are typed, discoverable tools registered with
document.modelContext when WebMCP is available.
Prototype boundary. Rivermark, its people, and all funding figures are fictional. Common Ground demonstrates transparent collaboration patterns; it is not a civic decision system or policy recommendation.